Comparison

Quarto vs SET: two games built on four traits

By Alejandro Rioja · October 28, 2026

Quarto and SET are built on the same idea: every item is a unique mix of four features, and you score by spotting a group that matches. The difference is the number of values. A Quarto piece has 2 options per trait, so there are 24 = 16 pieces. A SET card has 3 options per feature, so there are 34 = 81 cards. That one change gives different rules for a match, different odds and a different game: Quarto is a turn-based duel of hand-offs, and SET is a race to spot patterns. Both came out in 1991.

About us: we make Quads, an independent game built on the same hand-your-opponent-the-piece mechanic as Quarto. It isn't affiliated with Gigamic or the makers of Quarto.

16 vs 81pieces vs cards
29.45%of random 4-piece groups win in Quarto
1 in 79random 3-card groups form a SET
1991both games published

Side by side

QuartoSET
DesignerBlaise MüllerMarsha Falco
First published1991, by Gigamic1991, by Set Enterprises (designed 1974)
Components16 wooden pieces, 4×4 board81 cards
FeaturesHeight, colour, shape, topNumber, shape, shading, colour
Values per feature23
A match is4 pieces in a line sharing at least one trait3 cards where each feature is all the same or all different
PlayersExactly 2, taking turnsAny number, all at once
LuckNone: perfect informationThe order of the shuffled deck
Solved?Yes: a draw with perfect play (1998)Not a turn-based game, so not in that sense

Facts on SET are from Wikipedia's SET article, and on Quarto from Wikipedia's Quarto article and Gigamic. The counts below are our own, computed by listing every case, and they match the published SET figures.

What counts as a match

The rules for a match look alike but run in opposite directions:

With only two values, "all different" can't happen across three or four items, so Quarto's rule had to be looser. With three values, SET can demand that every feature behave.

A Quarto win: all four are tall (and round), whatever their colour and top.

The odds, computed

QuartoSET
Possible groups1,820 groups of 4 pieces85,320 groups of 3 cards
Groups that match5361,080
Chance a random group matches29.45% (about 1 in 3.4)1.27% (1 in 79)
Given all but one item of a group…Three pieces: 0, 5 or 9 of the other 13 pieces complete itTwo cards: exactly 1 of the other 79 cards completes it

Chance that a random group is a match

Quarto (4 pieces)29.45%
SET (3 cards)1.27%
Quarto: every group of 4 of the 16 pieces. SET: every group of 3 of the 81 cards. Both counted exhaustively.

A match is about 23 times likelier in Quarto. That's why the games feel so different. In SET, finding any match is the challenge. In Quarto, matches are everywhere, and the challenge is not giving one away.

The way groups match is telling, too. In SET, of the 1,080 sets, 108 differ in one feature, 324 in two, 432 in three and 216 in all four (10%, 30%, 40% and 20%). In Quarto, 512 winning groups share exactly one trait and only 24 share two. Almost every Quarto win hangs on a single trait.

How they play

Both are good with a mixed-age group, and both teach the same thinking: sorting items by features. Gigamic marks Quarto for ages 8 and up.

Which to play

Frequently asked questions

Is Quarto like SET?

Both use items that are unique combinations of four features. Quarto has 2 values per feature (16 pieces) and is a two-player turn-based game; SET has 3 values per feature (81 cards) and is a real-time pattern-spotting race.

How many cards are in SET?

81: every combination of four features with three values each (3 x 3 x 3 x 3).

How many pieces are in Quarto?

16: every combination of four traits with two values each (2 x 2 x 2 x 2).

Which is harder, Quarto or SET?

They test different skills. SET rewards speed at spotting patterns; Quarto rewards careful counting and planning two decisions per turn.